White House: Greenland Takeover a National Security Priority

White House: Greenland Takeover a National Security Priority

> At a Glance

> – The White House says acquiring Greenland is a “national security priority” that could involve U.S. military action

> – Denmark and six NATO allies vow to defend Greenland’s sovereignty

> – Options include purchase, free association agreement, or military action

> – Why it matters: The dispute could reshape Arctic security and strain NATO alliances

The Trump administration has escalated its push to bring Greenland under U.S. control, with the White House declaring it a national security imperative and acknowledging military options are under consideration.

White House Position

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated:

> “President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States, and it’s vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region.”

The administration is weighing multiple approaches:

  • Purchase from Denmark
  • Creating a compact of free association
  • U.S. military action

Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, told CNN:

> “It’s the formal position of the Trump administration that Greenland should be part of the United States.”

NATO Allies Respond

The leaders of France, Germany, Britain, Italy, Poland, Spain and Denmark issued a joint statement declaring:

> “Greenland belongs to its people.”

The allies emphasized that Denmark and Greenland alone hold decision-making authority. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned:

> “If the United States chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops.”

Historical Context

The U.S. has maintained a military base in Greenland for decades. A 1916 agreement saw America promise not to object to Danish control of Greenland in exchange for purchasing the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Trump has expressed interest in Greenland for months, citing its strategic location and mineral resources. He told NBC News he was “very serious” about acquisition.

house

Key Takeaways

  • The White House explicitly lists military action as a potential option for acquiring Greenland
  • Seven NATO allies have pledged to defend Greenland’s sovereignty
  • The U.S. has similar free association agreements with Marshall Islands, Micronesia and Palau
  • Denmark considers any military action against Greenland an attack on a NATO member
  • The dispute could test NATO’s mutual defense commitments

The administration’s hardline stance on Greenland acquisition could reshape Arctic geopolitics and strain transatlantic alliances.

Author

  • I’m Sarah L. Montgomery, a political and government affairs journalist with a strong focus on public policy, elections, and institutional accountability.

    Sarah L. Montgomery is a Senior Correspondent for News of Philadelphia, covering city government, housing policy, and neighborhood development. A Temple journalism graduate, she’s known for investigative reporting that turns public records and data into real-world impact for Philadelphia communities.

Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *